Unit 5: The Artist vs. The Audience

When it comes down to the comprehension of a piece of art, there is usually confusion about if the artist accurately expresses their ideas or if the audience perceived the message accurately. Is the comprehension of artwork dependent upon the creator or the critic? I believe that both parties are responsible for determining the meaning or message of a work of art. When an artist creates an art piece, it is up to them to give the audience visual cues that could be used to interpret the meaning behind the art piece. When an audience views an art piece, it is up to them to dissect and critically analyze every portion of the painting in an attempt to decipher the hidden message. It all comes down to how the artist and the audience view the artwork. The fact that every person has a different perspective when viewing art, complicates the communicative factors between the artist and the audience. Can the artist’s message ever be delivered without being distorted? Can the audience ever interpret what the artist is attempting to say? Should the artist use simplicity in order to ensure that the audience perceives the correct message? Despite how difficult it may be for the artist to communicate with their audience, I believe that the mystery of finding the artist’s message is an ideal way for the audience to analyze and learn the artist’s techniques. 

Unit 5: The Role of the Artist in Today's Society

Art is an everlasting subject that continues to evolve as time continues to progress. Without art, where would we be as a society? Would our society be as vibrant and exuberant without art? Would the world be as visually pleasing? Would we be satisfied? The answer to that is simply “NO”. Art is prevalent in and essential to our society. Without art, our society would be lifeless and dull. Art brightens our days and highlights our night. Art is the key to the heart of the society. Every aspect of today’s society is interlaced with art, ranging from our homes to our work places. We cannot escape art. The role of the artist in today’s society is to communicate and express their inner-being to the world. For example, billboards are used immensely nowadays. They are used to communicate to the viewer about a certain product and display the artist’s creative style. The artist’s role is to decorate and flourish the society with beautiful pieces of art. For example, the way in which a building is structured and painted or even things such as sculptures. The artist’s role in society is to entertain. For example, artist create things such as films, which is a major entertainment factor in today’s society. We need artist to keep the society detailed and interesting. Artists leave a remarkable touch on the world and without them, society would be a lost cause. 

Unit 5: Romanticism

Romanticism is an artistic movement that sought to oppose the views and beliefs of neoclassicism. The introduction of romanticism actually was the reason neoclassicism was no longer praised. Romanticism is not about love. Romanticism actually emphasizes imagination and emotions. I love romanticism because I believe that emotion and a sense of imagination is what art should be about. Art, to me, should be expressive and vivid. Art should express the feelings of the artist. Art should be a tad bit peculiar to keep your attention and keep you entertained. That is what romanticism is all about. It’s about capturing and retaining the viewer’s eye. It’s about creating a sense of sentience within the viewer. It’s about going beyond the boundaries of reality and emphasizing surrealism. A painting that we viewed in class was Theodore Gericault’s Raft of the Medusa. This painting actually depicted the real life event of when a group of Algerian immigrants were set adrift after a shipwreck off of the coast of Africa. This image emphasizes the pain and struggle that the men faced while on the raft. There were a plethora of corpses on and hanging off of the raft, emphasizing how gruesome and deadly this event was. The painting was not created to display the event. Instead, it was created to show the emotional toll and deprivation that the immigrants experienced during this event. 

Unit 5: Neoclassicism

Neoclassicism is an artistic movement that sought to revive the classical approach in art, literature, architecture, and music. It emerged in the mid-18^th century and originated in Rome. It was established to deviate from the Rococo style, which was established in the 18^th century and characterized by things such as light colors and playfulness. Neoclassical artist create art pieces that are realistic, rational, and objective. Neoclassical art is logical, conservative, and straight to the point. Neoclassical art displays the reality of things, showing exactly how things are. I dislike neoclassicism because this artistic movement does not support emotion and imagination. Despite the lack of important features such as emotion and imagination, neoclassical paintings are extremely detailed. They focus on proportion, realism, and the rationality of things. Neoclassical paintings usually display heroic and courageous scenes. One painting that we viewed in class that displayed a heroic act was Jacques-Louis David’s Oath of the Horatti. In this painting, there are soldiers saluting before going to war. A painting that displayed a courageous scene was Jacques-Louis David’s Death of Socrates. Socrates is shown with his finger pointing in the air seconds before drinking the concoction that would end his life. He was putting his hand in the air to symbolize him standing up for what he believed in. All in all, neoclassicism is very precise yet boring. 

Unit 4: Style and Gender

Style is defined as a characteristic manner or mode of artistic expression or design. Style is basically the way in which an artist chooses to display their work of art. For example, an artist can choose to use pencil as their artistic tool while another artist may choose to use pastel. Style is also based upon how the artist displays the figures within their piece of artwork. The gender of an artist is actually a major influence on what style they use to portray their figures. A great example of how gender can influence the style in which an artist displays figures is the painting Susannah and the Elders, which is the name of two separate paintings completed by two separate artists. Jacapo Tintoretto’s, a male artist, approach on Susannah and the Elders portrayed the woman as the guilty individual. The woman was naked in the forest, viewing her body through a mirror. Her body was not covered. The elders were shown peeking from behind a wall. What Jacapo Tintoretto is implying is that the Elders were only looking at Susannah because she put herself out there. She showcased her body in such a sense to grasp the attention of the Elders. Artemisia Gentileschi’s, a female artist, approach was quite different. In her perspective of Susannah and the Elders, the woman was portrayed as an individual who was frightened by the Elders. She was displayed as innocent. The Elders were shown as two characters harassing the woman. The same painting was created using different styles and techniques, with the gender of the artist being a major influence. 

Unit 4: Formalist Criticism

Formalist criticism is a form of criticism that focuses primarily on the elements and design of works of art instead of the historical factors or the biography of the artist. Formalist critics do not take into consideration the true meaning behind a painting. They only focus on the elements used to create the art piece. While the elements of design are essential in a work of art, the background of the piece of art is more important because it expresses the artist’s style and message. Ignoring the underlying message and focusing on things such as balance, lines, light and values, and colors depletes the communicative aspect of a painting. The background or the content of a piece of art defines it and gives it meaning. The content of a piece of art distinguishes it from another piece and makes it unique. The content of a piece of art speaks for the artist using the images present. A picture is only worth a thousand words when there is a story being depicted. By disregarding the content portion of artwork and focusing on the design tactics used, formalist critics miss out on the plot of the art piece. Personally, I believe critics should take into consideration every segment of a work of art because dissecting certain sections of the art piece only distorts the true meaning. 

Unit 4: Analyzing Content

Content is defined as everything contained within a piece of artwork, including the visual elements, subject matter, and underlying meaning or themes. Analyzing the content of a piece of artwork is crucial in understanding what the artist is trying to express. Any person could view an art piece and assume what the artist is displaying but being aware of the background and the underlying meaning of the painting highlights the true meaning of the artwork. In class, we’ve had discussions about Jacques-Louis David’s Death of Marat. Viewing the painting without having any prior background knowledge, one would assume that the male in the bathtub has committed suicide. There is a note in his hand, assumingly a suicide note. In reality, the male in the bathtub did not commit suicide, but was murdered. Another painting created in a similar manner as David’s painting was Sandow Birk’s Death of Manuel. The body of the deceased male was slumped exactly how Marat’s body was. The only difference was that Manuel’s body was in a car, while Marat’s body was in the bathtub. In order for the viewer to understand the pure content of the painting, they would have had to view David’s Death of Marat and understand the story being told. Analyzing content is extremely essential in determining the true meaning of what is being presented in the painting.